Facebook
Share/Bookmark

Recommended Guides

Starcraft Replay Xp System and User Rankings
How to write guides on Starcraft-Replay.com
How to embed Videos on Starcraft-replay.com
How to watch Starcraft 2 replays without beta access

Top 3 Guides

Starcraft-replay xp system and user rankings
Starcraft 2 protoss strategy: best counters vs zerg units
How to watch starcraft 2 replays without beta access

Latest Guides

Protoss strategy: chrono boost
Protoss build: 1 base robo
Protoss build: 2 gate rush

Vs Zerg : Top 3 Guides

Starcraft 2 protoss strategy: best counters vs zerg units
Build order: marine and marauder vs zerg
Speedlings vs fe zergs

Vs Protoss : Top 3 Guides

Protoss vs protoss basics
Zvp roach warren timing
Roach build for bronse-silver

Vs Terran : Top 3 Guides

Build order: zvt baneling break
Zerg vs terran
Terran vs terran
4.7 / 5 starstarstarstarstar ( 24 votes )

Masters of economy and production

The game of Starcraft has two major parts to it: the micro game, which consists of moving units and using abilities, and the macro game. The macro game is the section of play devoted to collecting resources and producing units. While, micro can definitely help win a game usually, at least in the upper reaches of the silver league, macro tends to really drive a win home.

Whichever team is producing the most units and collecting the most resources will generally win. Building proper counters and scouting is only part of production; numbers play a very large role as well and can sometimes overcome even the direct counter to units.

In a traditional 1v1 game there is not much that can be done; a single player is in charge of all aspects of micro and macro game play. This does not need to be the case in a 2v2. In a 2v2 responsibility can be split making for a smaller possible force, but one that is much more controlled. This is how my 2v2 team works if one of us is taken out. The dead person will take control of all aspects of micro, and as such our attacking force becomes much more deadly.

This same concept can be applied to macro if the map is Twilight Fortress. This map is unique in that it is not possible for a single player to be attacked. Any attacking force must attack both players. This situation opens up an amazing strategy that can severely out produce even two players combined.

The primary objective is to have one player focus entirely on resource collection, and have the other focus completely on unit production and micro. Due to the fact that after five minutes players are able to trade resources means that any resources gathered technically belong to both players. The player that is focusing on economy should be able to have at least double the resource collection rate of any player, and as such can funnel all of that money to the other player to be turned into units.

The main focus is the first five minutes of game play. During this time the production player must secure enough units to hold off minor rushes while at the same time preparing for the massive influx of minerals. The economy player’s primary goal is to get one of the high yield expansions before the pivotal five minute mark. This gives a drastic increase in the mineral collection rate and allows for the split team to have a severe edge in the minutes following.

As the game moves on, unless an extremely ferocious attack happens between 5:00 and 8:00, the enormous influx of minerals will allow the production player to produce an army that cannot be defeated. Even in the event of mass units, a team that is gathering an extra 1,000 minerals per minute or more will have enough to stop just about anything.

4 Warp Gates at 5 Minutes

4 Warp Gates at 5 Minutes

Already resourcing both gas

 

ss3
4 Warp Gates at 5 Minutes
585 Minerals and 332 Gas Transfered at 8 minutes

Further into late game, if the game lasts that long, the mineral and gas levels of an ever expanding economy player can never be rivaled. Even late into the mid game there will be a surplus of resources that cannot be spent due to supply restrictions. The economy player will be stuck holding more than 5,000 minerals and several thousand vespene gas. At this point, the only move is for the economy player to tech for an army, while still maintaining enough resource flow to keep the production player dominating.

The Final Clash at 14:00

ss5

Resource Rates at 14:00 Notice Light Blue

A surprise injection of capital ships can almost always turn the tide of the game in favor of the split team, however this is rarely a case that comes into play as most teams will be unable to handle the sheer number of units pouring into the battle field.

 

source: Tol @ Starcraft-source



23 Mar 2010 | Comments (7)
Share/Bookmark

Fjsdl wrote (2011-03-08 23:02:03)

avatar Zergling

I, myself, dont like the strategy... 2 minds are always better than one, no matter how good you are (considering you have a good allie)

  0 up rate down rate

Maritlage wrote (2010-11-02 12:20:28)

avatar Zergling

Really helpful and informative.  I plan on trying this strategy out sometime.

+1 up rate down rate

Silentdeath wrote (2010-03-25 23:25:23)

avatar Brutalisk

I thought this was a really good read. it did make me think

  0 up rate down rate

Pokkit wrote (2010-03-24 16:50:39)

avatar Zealot

This is an extremely interesting strategy to 2v2.  Despite the winning team having only 20 more harvesters than the losing team, they gathered double the minerals and 65% more gas.

Light blue alone gathered 51% more minerals with only 3 more harvesters.  What kind of split was there between gas harvesters and mineral harvesters, if available?  I don't have access to beta nor replays, at least the replays posted on this site.

Those high-yield expansions seem like the key to winning 2v2.

+4 up rate down rate

Jame wrote (2010-03-24 15:49:23)

avatar Thor guide with a copper shield awardedguide with a copper shield awardedguide with a copper shield awardedguide with a copper shield awarded shields awarded

Pretty interesting, I'll try that in 2v2 with Ashram ;)

  0 up rate down rate

Unreal wrote (2010-03-23 23:39:02)

avatar Zergling

like that!

  0 up rate down rate

Xedar wrote (2010-03-23 22:47:43)

avatar Zergling

Good written maybe little bit to much!

  0 up rate down rate

Page  1